A majority once thought that the universe was created in 6 days 6000 years ago. Hell, most of the world probably still does believe in something similar. So, no, majority or minority isn't important, all that matters is evidence.
And that evidence can be found on Youtube, LParchive, the Complete Materials, and so on. So, yes. We are indeed correct. Go and look at it yourself if you don't believe us.
Youtube, LP archive, Complete Materials etc. are big things. I don't have time to go looking through the entirety of them in order to prove your point. Either actually provide the evidence or accept that I am entitled to my opinion.
http://lparchive.org/Fatestay-night/
https://www.youtube.com/user/XerBlade/playlists
These will suffice for now. Yes, Mike, you are titled to your own opinion, however incorrect it may or may not be.
Yeah, sorry, but I don't have time to read through the entirety of FSN right now. Plus, I read it before and I don't recall what you're saying being there.
So, no, that doesn't suffice. If you want to convince me, point me at something that isn't going to take several days of reading to find the answer....
Weren't you the one preaching about facts being facts even if you can't prove them? How very hypocritical of you. Then again, that's my fault for expecting something from someone who believes robbery barely constitutes as a crime.
Facts are true independent of proof, but without proof there is no reason for anyone to believe them to be facts. Just stating "this is a fact" does not entitle you to be believed until proven wrong.
Youtube, LP archive, Complete Materials etc. are big things. I don't have time to go looking through the entirety of them in order to prove your point. Either actually provide the evidence or accept that I am entitled to my opinion.
You are so lazy. They already provided references. What kind of (alleged) academic you are that you don't feel like checking sources independently?
One who doesn't want to spend several days of time he could be using to do something more productive proving someone else's point for them....
And, you do realise, right, that when writing an academic paper, any claim you make has to be
sourced, by referring to the paper in question? True, you don't have to point to the specific location, but papers are short and, besides, there is a safeguard there in that
someone will check it (usually referees) even if every individual person does not.
In an argument, you have to provide your sources in a manner which allows the other person to check them easily and confirm if they do or do not say what you claim. Linking me to the LP is no good because it is not falsifiable. I can read through the entire LP and say it's not there, and you can just say "well, you must have missed it". If you're not willing to provide a falsifiable source that I can look at quickly and say "yes, OK, you're right" or "no, sorry, I disagree", then I am under no obligation whatsoever to go out of my way to disprove my own point without any way to disprove yours.