Brah, I did not post the Wikipedia link because I got my information from there, I posted it because I know damn well that you are talking shit and wanted to give you the opportunity to read up on a topic you self-evidentially do not understand.
If I wanted to learn about something I wouldn't go to something publicly editable, I'd go read thesis's and doctor's notes.
Yeah, Wikipedia is publicly editable, but it is still broadly reliable, especially on topics that are reasonably popular. And, in this case it is a matter of definition, so reading someone's thesis is not going to help, and nor is reading doctor's notes. You need to read the DSM or whatever, and that will tell you exactly what Wikipedia tells you, because Wikipedia uses it as a source.
Just because something is written by ordinary people it does not mean it is unreliable, and just because something is written by an "expert" it does not mean it is right. Wikipedia is reliable because it sources its information and has a lot of people hanging around solely to prevent vandalism. Sure, anyone can edit it, but bad-faith edits don't tend to stay for more than a few minutes, and would be instantly obvious if you checked the history.
Edit: Thank you, Umbra. And, yes, this is not the place to be having an argument over the definition of Asperger's Syndrome....