Author Topic: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).  (Read 171903 times)

The Man With All The Cute Boats

  • L-lewd
  • Administrator
  • Sentient NPC
  • **********
  • Posts: 957
  • This is too lewd for me, Sir
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #555 on: May 27, 2014, 11:06:20 PM »
you are wrong

Knick

  • Sentient NPC
  • ****
  • Posts: 914
  • Sion is Best
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #556 on: May 27, 2014, 11:14:55 PM »
I'm not confusing anything. As I said all of that is superfluous to Archer,,the character I'm going to play.

You don't know what superfluous means do you.

Superfluous
adjective
unnecessary, especially through being more than enough.
"the purchaser should avoid asking for superfluous information"
synonyms: surplus (to requirements), nonessential, redundant, unneeded, excess, extra, (to) spare, remaining, unused, left over, in excess, waste

In other words, something which defines the nature of your character is in no way "superfluous". Rather it would be essential.

lantzblades

  • Black King of the round table
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3676
  • GM
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #557 on: May 27, 2014, 11:22:20 PM »
Understanding Dark Rin is not essential as far as I can see Knick. Not for playing Archer.

until my possible ejection over a clerical error is resolved I don't feel like writing an essay guys.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2014, 11:24:50 PM by lantzblades »

The Man With All The Cute Boats

  • L-lewd
  • Administrator
  • Sentient NPC
  • **********
  • Posts: 957
  • This is too lewd for me, Sir
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #558 on: May 27, 2014, 11:23:55 PM »
you are wrong

lantzblades

  • Black King of the round table
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3676
  • GM
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #559 on: May 27, 2014, 11:32:30 PM »
I think I'm being fairly reasonable, writing out everything for it only to be ejected from the game is a complete waste of time. I'd prefer not to spend time without a point.

The Man With All The Cute Boats

  • L-lewd
  • Administrator
  • Sentient NPC
  • **********
  • Posts: 957
  • This is too lewd for me, Sir
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #560 on: May 27, 2014, 11:40:08 PM »
If you're fully expecting it to be rejected then I think there's something wrong with your character creation from the very root.

lantzblades

  • Black King of the round table
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3676
  • GM
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #561 on: May 27, 2014, 11:44:51 PM »
Not the character Names. I was referring to me being ejected. I don't want to scramble adding to the sheet or explaining back story just to be banned from the game for a running clerical error. It makes all the time I would spend explaining meaningless.

Arch-Magos Winter

  • The Machine Prophet
  • Servant
  • ******
  • Posts: 2349
  • Techpriest of Beasts Lair
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #562 on: May 27, 2014, 11:47:08 PM »
It is not a clerical error Lantz

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #563 on: May 27, 2014, 11:53:49 PM »
Yes, it is. He forgot to add it to the sheet, both in the original version of the RP (even though he was dark for most of that) and now in this version. And, neither I nor Elf noticed it missing from the old version, and nor did I notice it missing from the new version.

lantzblades

  • Black King of the round table
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3676
  • GM
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #564 on: May 27, 2014, 11:54:13 PM »
It is a proven five part clerical error. I edited the original sheet and missed adding the dark bit, mike edited the sheet and missed that fact, elf accepted the sheet and missed that fact. All in the original RP where he was dark. After that I reedited the sheet for the new format and forgot to mention the dark bit on the sheet after removing a few things, Elf accepted the sheet again and again missed the lack of it. It's just a running clerical error.

The Man With All The Cute Boats

  • L-lewd
  • Administrator
  • Sentient NPC
  • **********
  • Posts: 957
  • This is too lewd for me, Sir
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #565 on: May 27, 2014, 11:55:48 PM »
She missed it in the new bit? Dude, she didn't know you'd go dark. She didn't miss what wasn't there.

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #566 on: May 27, 2014, 11:56:43 PM »
No, true, but I knew that and still missed it, and Elf also missed it in the original version (where she knew he could go dark because he had done so previously).

The Man With All The Cute Boats

  • L-lewd
  • Administrator
  • Sentient NPC
  • **********
  • Posts: 957
  • This is too lewd for me, Sir
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #567 on: May 28, 2014, 12:13:11 AM »
Ragna accepts no free help.

He might, however rarely, sometimes ask for it.

Kurogami

  • NPC
  • ***
  • Posts: 294
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #568 on: May 28, 2014, 12:22:34 AM »
Lantz, gonna be honest here, putting some extra effort in to fix the problems in your sheets as best you can may be your only chance at this point...

Kurogami

  • NPC
  • ***
  • Posts: 294
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects: Rebirth (2.0) Discussion Page (OOC).
« Reply #569 on: May 28, 2014, 01:00:06 AM »
MAKO