Author Topic: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion  (Read 125632 times)

Panda

  • Panda
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3429
  • Deal with it. B-)
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #510 on: December 01, 2014, 01:51:18 AM »
Mike. You do realize that, the very moment that most of the chars here find out about what this guy is planning, that a fair few will be racing each other to ice this fucker? And, with the fact that we also have a fair few telepaths and others who are very good investigators, this will likely happen before you can pull this off.

Just a fair warning.
[8:49:50 AM] Daniel Mahan: He can still get RAEG
[8:49:52 AM] Daniel Mahan: Just better at not loosing his marbles over it.
[8:50:09 AM] Helligator:> losing his marbles over it
                                      I seeeee what you did there


[11:00:22 PM] francobull III: elf, will you do rin?
[11:00:33 PM] Jennifer Bratcher: I would love to do Rin!
[11:00:39 PM] Jennifer Bratcher: I'd bend her over and . . .
[11:00:45 PM] francobull III: woah woah

francobulli'd - Today at 4:53 PM
i litterally
said
FORCE
not penetration
sheesh



Sakura Today at 7:09 PM
don't see anything that triggers my gm senses

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #511 on: December 01, 2014, 01:54:37 AM »
Ahem, Mike, I think I speak for all when I say no one wants to be tortured and/or raped.

Yes, obviously. And, I'm pretty sure people don't want to get killed, either. Doesn't mean it can't happen in the RP....

I will be bluntly honest, Mike: what the fuck? You despise Shinji and Zouken with all your might, but here you are saying that rape is "hot".
I just...I just...what.

Because I would not actually rape anyone. Fantasy is not reality.

There's a fucking big difference between "has a rape fetish" and "rapes four-year-old girls with penis worms".

To think I get "scolded" just for quoting Wikipedia entry for lulz.

Because you were making a sick joke. I just happen to like particular things.

There is no point in having antagonist characters if they cannot do bad things. Yes, rape is bad, but so is murder, and so are a whole bunch of other things. If we're going to say "no rape is allowed", we should also say "absolutely no killing under any circumstances (even of NPCs)".

I would not force anyone who was not willing to RP a rape scene, because that would be unfair on them. But, if rape was in-character then it would make sense for it to happen just as much as any other IC action (although I would generally not force anything that causes someone serious RPing problems).

Mike. You do realize that, the very moment that most of the chars here find out about what this guy is planning, that a fair few will be racing each other to ice this fucker? And, with the fact that we also have a fair few telepaths and others who are very good investigators, this will likely happen before you can pull this off.

Just a fair warning.

Well, yes, obviously. The guy is an antagonist, he's not supposed to be popular. And, I doubt anyone would actually find out too quickly, any more than they instantly work out that any other antagonist is intending to commit mass murder or whatever.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 01:56:34 AM by Cherry Lover »

Lycodrake

  • Multi-Classed Idol
  • Sentient NPC
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #512 on: December 01, 2014, 02:06:42 AM »
You do realize that Shinji and Zouken are fictional characters, right Mike? And therefore fictional rape.
I do not see the difference between what your villain is apparently wanting to do and what they did in the VN.
Spoiler for Best -monogatari:

Kat

  • Moon Cancer
  • ********
  • Posts: 4215
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #513 on: December 01, 2014, 02:07:38 AM »
Quote
Because you were making a sick joke. I just happen to like particular things.

>Ironical memepost
> worse than torture fetishism.

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #514 on: December 01, 2014, 02:13:19 AM »
You do realize that Shinji and Zouken are fictional characters, right Mike? And therefore fictional rape.

Yes, but in-universe, their actions are real.

Quote
I do not see the difference between what your villain is apparently wanting to do and what they did in the VN.

Nothing at all. But, I'm not claiming to like my villain. Quite the contrary, he would be a complete bastard, on the level of Zouken. But, that's kind-of the point. He's an antagonist.

I hate Shinji, but I don't hate Koto for liking or RPing Shinji, because Koto isn't actually raping anyone. Similarly, I don't hate Nasu for writing Shinji or Zouken, because they're villainous characters and are supposed to be hated, and nor do I dislike him for writing Sakura's backstory, because it's fictional.

Quote
Because you were making a sick joke. I just happen to like particular things.

>Ironical memepost
> worse than torture fetishism.

Yes, it is, because there is fucking nothing wrong with having a particular fetish. If you have a problem with it, then that is your problem. You have no damn right to tell me what I can and cannot like.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 02:15:29 AM by Cherry Lover »

Alice

  • Administrator
  • Master
  • **********
  • Posts: 1703
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #515 on: December 01, 2014, 02:45:35 AM »
Problem is that you aren't straight out clarifying that you think rape is wrong and horrible despite having a fetish for it. That needs to be clear.

...Also rape is kinda sorta worse than murder. By a lot. It's kinda horrible to say otherwise.

Besides running the forum, I can provide avatars for people as well~
This is my mod voice. ...Most of the time anyway.

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #516 on: December 01, 2014, 02:47:52 AM »
Problem is that you aren't straight out clarifying that you think rape is wrong and horrible despite having a fetish for it. That needs to be clear.

Yeah, sorry, that is something I should be clear about. I have a rape fetish, I do not consider actual rape to be in any way OK.

Kotomine_Rin

  • The God Tongue
  • Administrator
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 5599
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #517 on: December 01, 2014, 02:49:17 AM »
But like, why would you want to write a character who violates a character you like!?

Panda

  • Panda
  • Alter Ego
  • *******
  • Posts: 3429
  • Deal with it. B-)
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #518 on: December 01, 2014, 02:51:12 AM »
I think that's part of the appeal. Somehow.
[8:49:50 AM] Daniel Mahan: He can still get RAEG
[8:49:52 AM] Daniel Mahan: Just better at not loosing his marbles over it.
[8:50:09 AM] Helligator:> losing his marbles over it
                                      I seeeee what you did there


[11:00:22 PM] francobull III: elf, will you do rin?
[11:00:33 PM] Jennifer Bratcher: I would love to do Rin!
[11:00:39 PM] Jennifer Bratcher: I'd bend her over and . . .
[11:00:45 PM] francobull III: woah woah

francobulli'd - Today at 4:53 PM
i litterally
said
FORCE
not penetration
sheesh



Sakura Today at 7:09 PM
don't see anything that triggers my gm senses

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #519 on: December 01, 2014, 02:52:07 AM »
But like, why would you want to write a character who violates a character you like!?

I already explained that.

The problem is that I like Sakura both as a character and also sexually. So, it's natural for me to push a lot of the sexual aspects onto her as well. The two are somewhat independent (if Ilya was my favourite character I would not do such stuff with her, because I don't find her attractive), and, admittedly, unfortunately somewhat contradictory.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2014, 02:53:38 AM by Cherry Lover »

Kat

  • Moon Cancer
  • ********
  • Posts: 4215
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #520 on: December 01, 2014, 02:56:34 AM »
I'm sure I don't have a problem, unless that's the fact I needlessly argue in favor of players who can support their opinion just fine, procrasting here in result.

Knick

  • Sentient NPC
  • ****
  • Posts: 914
  • Sion is Best
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #521 on: December 01, 2014, 11:55:12 PM »
Franco, can you stop posting out to turn. It was moony's turn

Cherry Lover

  • The Maintainer
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 6375
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #522 on: December 01, 2014, 11:59:33 PM »
Yeah, Franco, you need to give everyone a chance to post. You can't just reply to everything immediately.

Kat

  • Moon Cancer
  • ********
  • Posts: 4215
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #523 on: December 02, 2014, 12:04:34 AM »
It's already chaotic enough.

Kotomine_Rin

  • The God Tongue
  • Administrator
  • SE.RA.PH
  • **********
  • Posts: 5599
    • View Profile
Re: Cross Effects 3.0 - The Third Time's the Charm? General Discussion
« Reply #524 on: December 02, 2014, 12:39:29 AM »
Damn, sorry for that (again).
I assumed Moon quite literally left the area, thus didn't concieve that he could still be spying or lurking.
I should have taken into account he could still observe, thus react.
Damn, I keep messing it up, but I swear I'll get the hang of it.
I just have to be more careful next time.
Again, sorry for that >_<